Authors | Nameet Kumar Sethy1, Manideep Yenugula2, Shankha Shubhra Goswami1, Amrita Bhola1, Dhiren Kumar Behera1 |
Affiliations |
1 Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang, 759146 Odisha, India 2 Dvg Tech Solutions Inc., New Jersey, USA |
Е-mail | ssg.mech.official@gmail.com |
Issue | Volume 15, Year 2023, Number 4 |
Dates | Received 10 June 2023; revised manuscript received 10 August 2023; published online 30 August 2023 |
Citation | Nameet Kumar Sethy, Manideep Yenugula, Shankha Shubhra Goswami, et al., J. Nano- Electron. Phys. 15 No 4, 04006 (2023) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.15(4).04006 |
PACS Number(s) | 74.25.Fy, 84.71.Mn, 88.60. – m |
Keywords | MCDM, PIV, CoCoSo, Hydropower, Renewable energy. |
Annotation |
The selection of a suitable small hydropower project and its criteria for investment is a crucial task involving various aspects and plans. This decision-making can also be seen as a multi-criteria review issue with the correlation of criteria and alternatives. This role should take into account a number of competing aspects due to the growing complexities of social, economic, technical and environmental factors. Traditional decision-making methods cannot address the complexities of such systems. Multi-criteria approaches have more and more versatile tools. The goal of this paper is to assess the applicability of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) based Proximity Index Value (PIV) and Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) technique during the planning and development of small hydropower projects. The application of this PIV novel approach to a small hydropower project organization and expansion scenario is lacking in renewable energy literature due to the difficulty of its evaluation. |
List of References |